1. Family: Fabaceae Lindl.
    1. Dinizia Ducke

      1. This genus is accepted, and its native range is Guianas to Brazil.

    [LOWO]

    Legumes of the World. Edited by G. Lewis, B. Schrire, B. MacKinder & M. Lock. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. (2005)

    Habit
    Trees
    Ecology
    Tropical non-inundated (often riverine) rain forest
    Distribution
    Amazonian S America (Brazil, Guyana)
    Note
    Apparently closer to the Dimorphandra group of Caesalpinioideae than to the Mimosoideae (Luckow et al., 2000; 2003)

    The tribe Mimoseae (sensu Bentham, 1875) is retained here simply as a matter of convenience. All recent phylogenetic analyses indicate that Ingeae and Acacieae are derived from within Mimoseae (Chappill & Maslin, 1995; Käss & Wink, 1996; Luckow et al., 2000; Bruneau et al., 2001; Luckow et al., 2003; Herendeen et al., 2003a), making it a paraphyletic group at best. The most recent studies indicate that it may not even be monophyletic with respect to the Caesalpinioideae (Luckow et al., 2000; Bruneau et al., 2001; Luckow et al., 2003).

    Although the outline of a new tribal classification of the mimosoids is emerging, we await better-supported phylogenies (based on more extensive data) before formalising new stable and useful groups. Some parts of the classification proposed here are better supported than others. Notably, the basal branches in Fig. 24 are poorly supported in most analyses and the relationships among the groups are likely to change as we acquire more data. As presently indicated (Luckow et al., 2003), the type genus Mimosa falls within the derived Piptadenia group which is in turn sister, and basally branching, to elements of Acacia and Ingeae (Fig. 24). A more narrowly circumscribed Mimoseae sens. strict. will thus leave the bulk of Mimoseae sens. lat. (i.e., as treated here) in need of new tribal allocation. The most conspicuous difference between the classification presented here and that of Lewis & Elias (1981) is the inclusion of tribe Parkieae within Mimoseae. The former was circumscribed based on imbricate aestivation of the calyx, and was considered the basal tribe within the Mimosoideae (Elias, 1981a). Recent phylogenetic analyses (Chappill & Maslin, 1995; Luckow et al., 2000; Bruneau et al., 2001; Luckow et al., 2003; Herendeen et al., 2003a), indicate that the two genera in the Parkieae, Parkia and Pentaclethra, are not sister taxa (Fig. 24). Pentaclethra is nested within Mimoseae in Luckow et al. (2000), but is either sister to caesalpinioid taxa in Bruneau et al. (2001) and Herendeen et al. (2003a), or part of a basal polytomy with Mimoseae and caesalpinioid taxa (Luckow et al., 2003). Both Parkia and Pentaclethra are included in the tribe Mimoseae pending additional data and tribal recircumscription.

    Recent work (Luckow et al., submitted a) also indicates that the monospecific tribe Mimozygantheae should be subsumed in the Mimoseae near Piptadeniopsis and Prosopidastrum, currently in the Prosopis group. Otherwise, the informal groups within the Mimoseae recognised by Lewis & Elias (1981) are relatively well-supported by current phylogenies and only a few departures have been made from their system. Where relationships are either poorly supported or unresolved, the classification of Lewis & Elias (1981) is retained. The Xylia group is dismantled and the Adenanthera group recircumscribed to include Calpocalyx and Xylia . Desmanthus has been removed from the Dichrostachys group, as has Neptunia, in agreement with recent molecular and morphological phylogenetic studies (Harris et al., 1994; Hughes, 1998; Luckow, 1995, 1997). A new group is erected to accommodate Piptadeniastrum which is well separated from Newtonia in the most recent phylogeny (Luckow et al., 2000; 2003), and another to accommodate Cylicodiscus, which is more closely related to the clade containing the Prosopis, Leucaena, Dichrostachys, and Piptadenia groups than it is to the Newtonia group. Neptunia is well supported as sister to Prosopidastrum in recent analyses (Luckow et al., 2003) and is included in the Prosopis group here. Relationships of genera in the Prosopis group are not resolved, but the group is retained here as there is no evidence that it is not monophyletic. Genera newly described since 1981 include Alantsilodendron, Calliandropsis, Kanaloa, and Lemurodendron. Alantsilodendron and Calliandropsis are placed in the Dichrostachys group, and Kanaloa in the Leucaena group based on phylogenetic analyses (Hughes, 1998; Luckow, 1997; Luckow et al., 2000). Lemurodendron is tentatively included in the Newtonia group as suggested by Villiers & Guinet (1989). As treated here the Mimoseae comprises 40 genera and from (859)– 869–(879) species.

    [LOWO]
    Use
    Dinizia excelsa Ducke, (angelim vermelho, red angelim, angelim pedra, parakwa) is used for timber (heavy construction, flooring, stairs, ship building, posts and railway sleepers) and in reforestation

    Images

    Distribution

    Native to:

    Brazil North, Brazil Southeast, Brazil West-Central, Guyana, Suriname

    Dinizia Ducke appears in other Kew resources:

    First published in Arch. Jard. Bot. Rio de Janeiro 3: 76 (1922)

    Accepted by

    • Govaerts, R. (2000). World Checklist of Seed Plants Database in ACCESS D: 1-30141.

    Literature

    Kew Bulletin
    • LPWG (2017). A new subfamily classification of the Leguminosae based on a taxonomically compre­hensive phylogeny. Taxon 66(1): 44 - 77.
    • Babineau, M. & Bruneau, A. (2017). Phylogenetic and biogeographical history of the Afro-Madagascan genera Delonix, Colvillea and Lemuropisum (Fabaceae: Caesalpinioideae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 184: 59 - 78. https://doi.org/10.1093/botlinnean/box009
    • Banks, H. & Rudall, P. (2016). Pollen structure and function in caesalpinioid legumes. Amer. J. Bot. 103: 423 - 536.
    • IUCN (2012). IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. Second Edition. IUCN, Gland and Cambridge. Lora, J., Herrero, M. & Hormaza, J. I. (2014).
    • Manzanilla, V. & Bruneau, A. (2012). Phylogeny reconstruction in the Caesalpinieae grade (Leguminosae) based on duplicated copies of the sucrose synthase gene and plastid markers. Molec. Phylogenet. Evol. 65: 149 - 162.
    • McNeill, J., Barrie, F. R., Buck, W. R., Demoulin, V., Greuter, W., Hawksworth, D. L., Herendeen, P. S., Knapp, S., Marhold, K., Prado, J., Prud'homme van Reine, W. F., Smith, G. F., Wiersema, J. H. & Turland, N. J. (eds) (2012). International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Mel­bourne Code). Regnum Veg. 154. Koeltz Scientific Books.
    • Barneby, R. C., Grimes, J. W. & Poncy, O. (2011). Leguminosae subfamily 87. Mimosoideae. In: M. J. Jansen-Jacobs (ed.), Fl. Guianas, Series A, Phanerogams Fascicle 28. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
    • Banks, H. , Himanen, I. & Lewis, G. P. (2010). Evolution of pollen, stigmas and ovule numbers at the caesalpinioid-mimosoid interface (Fabaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 162: 594 - 615.
    • Richter, H. G. & Dallwitz, M. J. (2009). Commercial timbers: descriptions, illustrations, identification, and information retrieval. In English, French, German, Portuguese, and Spanish. Version: 25th June 2009. http://delta-intkey.com
    • Bruneau, A., Mercure, M., Lewis, G. P. & Herendeen, P. S. (2008). Phylogenetic patterns and diversifica­tion in caesalpinioid legumes. Botany 86: 697 - 718.
    • Andrade, K. S. (2006). Atlas toponimico de origem indigena do estado do Tocantins — projeto ATITO (PhD thesis). Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciencias Humanas, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo.
    • Luckow, M., Fortunato, R. H., Sede, S. & Livshultz, T. (2005). The phylogenetic affinities of two mysteri­ous monotypic mimosoids from southern South America. Syst. Bot. 30(3): 585 - 602.
    • Banks, H. (2003). Structure of pollen apertures in the Detarieae sensu stricto (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae), with particular reference to underly­ing structures (Zwischenkorper). Ann. Bot. 92: 425 - 435.
    • Luckow, M. , Miller, J. T., Murphy, D. J. & Livshultz, T. (2003). A phylogenetic analysis of the Mimosoideae (Leguminosae) based on chloroplast DNA se­quence data. In: B. Klitgaard & A. Bruneau (eds), Advances in Legume Systematics. Part 10, Higher Level Systematics, pp. 197 - 220. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
    • Sprent, J. I. (2001). Nodulation in Legumes.Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
    • Ribeiro, J. E. L. da S., Hopkins, M. J. G., Vicentini, A., Sothers,C.A.,Costa,M.A.daS.,Brito,J.M.de,Souza, M. A. D. de, Martins, L. H. P., Lohmann, L. G., Assun^ao, P. A. C. L., Pereira, E. da C., Silva, C. F. da, Mesquita, M. R. & Procopio, L. C. (1999). Flora da Reserva Ducke, Guia de identificafdo das plantas vasculares de uma floresta de terra- firme na Amazonia Central. INPA, Manaus.
    • Fearnside, P. M. (1997). Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 59 - 87.
    • Ferguson, I. K. & Banks, H. (1994). Tetrad pollen in the subfamily Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae) and its significance. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 83: 31 - 42.
    • Lorenzi, H. (1992). Arvores Brasileiras, Manual de identiftcafdo e cultivo de plantas arboreas nativas do Brasil. Editora Plantarum Ltda., Nova Odessa. p. 176 ( Dinizia excelsa).
    • Moreira, F. M. de S., Silva M. F. da & de Faria, S. M.(1992). Occurrence of nodulation in legume species in the Amazon region of Brazil. New Phytol. 121: 563 - 570.
    • Herendeen, P. S. & Dilcher, D. L. (1990). Fossil mimosoid legumes from the Eocene and Oligocene of southeastern North America. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 62: 339 - 361.
    • Sampaio, T. (1987). O tupi na geografia nacional, 5th ed. E. Nacional, Sao Paulo.
    • Guinet, Ph. (1981). Mimosoideae: the characters of their Pollen Grains. In: R. M. Polhill & P. H. Raven (eds), Advances in Legume Systematics, part 2: 835 - 857. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
    • Crepet, W. L. & Dilcher, D. L. (1977). Investigations of angiosperms from the Eocene of southeastern North America: a mimosoid inflorescence. Amer. J. Bot. 64: 714 - 725.
    • Da Silva, M. F., Lisboa, P. L. B. & Lisboa, R. C. L. (1977). Nomes vulgares deplantas amazonicas. INPA, Belem.
    • Ancibor, E. (1969). Losnectariosflorales en Leguminosas-Mimosoideas. Darwiniana 15: 128 - 140.
    • Sorsa, P. (1969). Pollen morphological studies on the Mimosaceae. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 6: 1 - 34.
    • Ducke, A.  (1949). Notas sobre a Flora Neotropica-II, As Leguminosas da Amazonia Brasileira. Bol. Tecn. Inst. Agron. N. 18: 64 - 65 ( Dinizia).
    • Burkart, A. (1943). Las leguminosas argentinas, silvestres y cultivadas. Acme Agency, Buenos Aires.
    • Ducke, A. (1922). Plantes nouvelles ou peu connues de la region amazonienne (IIe Partie). Arch. Jard. Bot. Rio de Janeiro 3: 76 - 78 ( Dinizia).
    • Microspore development in Annona (Annonaceae): differences between monad and tetrad pollen. Amer. J. Bot. 101: 1 - 11.
    • Thiers, B. [continuously updated]. Index Herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden’s Virtual Herbarium. Published at: http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/

    Sources

    Kew Backbone Distributions
    The International Plant Names Index and World Checklist of Selected Plant Families 2019. Published on the Internet at http://www.ipni.org and http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/
    © Copyright 2017 World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0

    Kew Names and Taxonomic Backbone
    The International Plant Names Index and World Checklist of Selected Plant Families 2019. Published on the Internet at http://www.ipni.org and http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/
    © Copyright 2017 International Plant Names Index and World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0

    Legumes of the World Online
    http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0