Fabaceae Lindl.
Hymenaea L.

Hymenaea cangaceira R.B.Pinto, Mansano & A.M.G.Azevedo

This species is accepted, and its native range is Brazil (Ceará).


Barbosa Pinto R et al. 2017. On the “Cangaço” route: a new species of Hymenaea (Leguminosae) from the Brazilian Caatinga. Kew Bulletin 72:42. DOI 10.1007/S12225-017-9713-6

Based on the IUCN Redlist criterion B1 (IUCN2016, Extent of Occurrence), the species’ relatively large geographical distribution (EOO=536,602 Km2) implies that it should be placed in the Least Concern category (LC).
Hymenaea cangaceira occurs in the Caatinga region of Northeastern Brazil, usually on sandy or rocky soils.
Morphology General Habit
Trees to c. 10 m, rarely taller; bark striate, light to dark brown, with lenticels; exudate not observed; branch- lets terete in cross section, 5 - 9 mm thick, glabrescent
Morphology Leaves Petiole
Petioles terete, basally and apically enlarged, 8 - 15 mm long, glabrous, rarely sparsely pubescent; petiolules twisted, 2.7 - 5.9 mm long, glabrous, rarely sparsely pubescent; leaflet blades chartaceous, ovate to broadly-elliptic, c. 2x longer than wide, 5.1 - 6.8 x 2.9 - 4 cm, glabrous, the base rounded, asymmetric, the apex usually retuse to rounded, rarely slightly acuminate, the adaxial surface lustrous, the midrib and secondary veins salient abaxially and inconspicuous adaxially
Morphology Leaves Stipules
Stipules caducous
Morphology Reproductive morphology Flowers Androecium Stamens
Stamens 10, glabrous, the filaments white, gland-dotted on the surface, 20 – 27.5 mm long, the anthers cream to yellow, oblong to elliptic, 6.6 - 6.8 x 1.3 - 1.5 mm, glabrous
Morphology Reproductive morphology Flowers Calyx
Calyx light brown to golden, densely tomentose abaxially and sericeous adaxially, the segments 4, subequal, elliptic to ovate, 14 - 15.6 x 8 - 12.4 mm
Morphology Reproductive morphology Flowers Corolla
Corolla pentamerous, the petals subequal, white, membranaceous, glabrous, caducuous, the blade slightly clawed, elliptic, 12.4 - 13.2 x 6.5 - 8 mm, the claw c. 1.8 mm long
Morphology Reproductive morphology Flowers Gynoecium
Gynoecium cream-yellowish, reddish when fertilised, glabrous; the stipe terete in cross section, 1.8 - 2.5 mm long, glabrous, the ovary oblong or slightly arcuate-elliptic, 6.9 - 7.2 x 3.3 - 3.5 mm, glabrous or rarely with very few hairs at the base, ovules c. 13, the style terete in cross section, 12 - 14.5 mm long, glabrous, the stigma punctiform
Morphology Reproductive morphology Flowers Pedicel
Pedicels rectangular in cross section, 4.1 - 5.9 x 1.9 - 3.1 mm, velutinous; bracteoles paired, opposite, inserted at apex of pedicel, obovate, 5.7 - 7.6 x 4 - 5.8 mm, densely tomentose abaxially and glabrous adaxially caducous; hypanthium 4.1 - 5.8 x 5 - 7 mm; flower buds light brown to golden, ellipsoid, 8.3 - 9.7 x 7.5 - 9.1 mm, tomentose
Morphology Reproductive morphology Fruits
Fruit camara type, brown, relatively smooth, glabrous, the body usually cylindrical or slightly laterally compressed, 7.5 - 10 x 3.8 - 4.5 cm
Morphology Reproductive morphology Inflorescences
Inflorescences cymose, terminal, with corymbiform aspect, with three orders of branching, the flowers c. 7 - 18 per axis, spirally arranged on the axis, the axis rectangular, 2.3 -3 mm wide, velutinous; bracts early caducous
Morphology Reproductive morphology Seeds
Seeds c. 3 - 6 per fruit, brown, irregularly circular, c. 2.5 x 1.5 cm
In the context of the genus, the new species is similar to Hymenaea martiana and H. longifolia in having ovate to broadly-elliptic leaflets, brownish fruits, and a geographical distribution that overlaps those of both species; but it differs from H. martiana by having the leaflets and ovary entirely glabrous (vs the leaflets pubescent abaxially and the ovary with a dense tuft of golden hairs at the base), and from H. longifolia in having generally smaller leaflets (5.1 - 6.8 x 2.9 - 4 cm vs 10.5 - 13 x 5 - 6 cm) and smaller (7.5 - 10 x 3.8 - 4.5 cm vs 12 -15 x 5 - 6 cm) and cylindrical fruits (vs more strongly compressed and expanded toward apex). In addition, H. cangaceira is usually separable from H. martiana by its narrower shade diameter and more sparsely foliated canopy. Moreover, although they may occur sympatrically, H. cangaceira is found exclusively in the Caatinga, while H. martiana is more commonly found in the Cerrado. With respect to H. longifolia, H. cangaceira typically has a more strongly arborescent habit ( H. longifolia being predominantly shrubs or treelets) and less obviously cordate (or auriculate) leaflets. The species is named for the “Cangaceiros,” members of the “Cangaço” social and political movement, who in the early 20th century occupied the surroundings of several towns in the northeastern region of Brazil (Clemente2007). Some of these same towns are the seats ofthe municipalities in which the new species occurs. The Cangaçeiros were known for their ability seemingly to vanish from the pursuing authorities in the open and dry land­scape of the Caatinga, hiding themselves with camou­flage costumes in the thorny vegetation. Similarly, Hymenaea cangaceira has until now been “hiding” from taxonomists in the same geographical region, being confused with sympatric and morphologically similar species.
Flowering from November to March, fruiting from March to April.
Type: Brazil, Ceara, Brejo Santo, J. G. Carvalho-Sobrinho et al. 1930 (holotype HVASF!; isotype HUEFS!).
Jatoba (Portuguese).

Native to:

Brazil Northeast

Hymenaea cangaceira R.B.Pinto, Mansano & A.M.G.Azevedo appears in other Kew resources:

First published in Kew Bull. 72(3)-42: 2 (2017)

Accepted by

  • Govaerts, R., Nic Lughadha, E., Black, N., Turner, R. & Paton, A. (2021). The World Checklist of Vascular Plants, a continuously updated resource for exploring global plant diversity. Scientific Data 8: 215.


Kew Bulletin

  • BFG (2015). Growing knowledge: an overview of Seed Plant diversity in Brazil. Rodriguesia 66(4): 1085 -1113.
  • Bruneau, A., Breteler, F.J, Klitgaard, B. B., Prenner, G., Fougere-Danezan, M. & Tucker, S. C. (2014). Floral evolution in the Detarieae (Leguminosae): Phylogenetic evidence for labile floral development in an early-diverging legume lineage. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 175(4): 392 - 417.
  • Bruneau, A., Breteler, F.J, Mercure, M., Lewis, G. P. & Herendeen, P. S. (2008). Phylogenetic patterns and diversification in the caesalpinioid legumes. Botany 86: 697 - 718.
  • Bruneau, A., Breteler, F.J., Wieringa, J.J., Gervais, G.Y.F. & Forest, F. (2000). Phylogenetic relationships in tribes Macrolobieae and Detarieae inferred from chloroplast trnL intron sequences. In: P. S. Herendeen & A. Bruneau (eds), Advances in legume systematics, part 9, pp. 121 - 149. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
  • Cardoso, D. B. O. S., Queiroz, L. P. & Lima, H. C. (2008). Three new species of Luetzelburgia (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae) from the caatinga of Bahia, Brazil and an identification key to all species of the genus. Kew Bull. 63: 289 - 300.
  • Carneiro-Torres, D. S., Cordeiro, I., Giulietti, A. M., Berry, P. E. & Riina, R. (2011). Three new species of Croton (Euphorbiaceae s.s.) from the Brazilian Caatinga. Brittonia 63: 122 - 132.
  • Clemente, M. E. A. (2007). Cangayo e Cangaceiros: Historias e Imagens Fotograficas do Tempo de Lampiao. Revista Hist. Estud. Cult. 4(4): 1 - 15.
  • Cordula, E., Queiroz, L. P. & Alves, M. (2008). Checklist da Flora de Mirandiba, Pernambuco: Leguminosae. Rodriguesia 59(3): 597 - 602.
  • Fougere-Danezan, M., Herendeen, P. S., Maumont, S. & Bruneau, A. (2010). Morphological evolution in the variable resin-producing Detarieae (Fabaceae): do morpho­logical characters retain a phylogenetic signal? Ann. Bot. 105: 311 - 325.
  • Fougere-Danezan, M., Maumont, S. & Bruneau, A. (2007). Relationships among resin producing Detarieae s.l. (Leguminosae) as inferred by molec­ular data. Syst. Bot. 32(4): 748 - 761.
  • Goto, B. T., Silva, G. A., Maia, L. C. & Oehl, F. (2010). Dentiscutata colliculosa,anewspeciesinthe Glomeromycetes from Northeastern Brazil with colliculate spore ornamentation. Nova Hedwigia 90: 383 - 393.
  • IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee. (2016). GuidelinesforUsingtheIUCNRedListCategoriesandCriteria. Version 12. Prepared by the IUCN species survival commission. IUCN Council, Gland and Cambridge. Available from: 02 Aug. 2016).
  • LPWG (The Legume Phylogeny Working Group) (2013). Legume phylogeny and classification in the 21st century: Progress, prospects and lessons for other species-rich clades. Taxon 62: 217 - 248
  • LPWG, (2017). A new subfamily classification of the Leguminosae based on a taxonomically compre­hensive phylogeny. Taxon 66: 44 - 77.
  • Lee,Y.T.&Langenheim,J.H.(1975). Systematicsofthegenus Hymenaea L., Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, Detarieae. University of California Publications Press, Berkeley.
  • Linares-Palomino, R., Oliveira-Filho, A. T. & Pennington, R. T. (2011). Neotropical seasonally dry forests: diversity, endemism, and biogeography of woody plants. In: R.Dirzo,H.S.Young,H.A.Mooney & G. Ceballos (eds), Seasonally dry tropical forests: ecology and conservation, pp. 3 - 21. Island Press, Washington.
  • Moro, M. F., Lughadha, E. N., Filer, D. L., Araujo, F. S. & Martins, F. R. (2014). A catalogue of the vascular plants of the Caatinga Phytogeographic Domain: a synthesis of floristic and phytosociological survey. Phytotaxa 160(1): 001 - 118.
  • Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E. D., Burgess,N.D.,Powell,G.V.N.,Underwood,E.C., D'Amico,J.A.,Itoua,I.,Strand,H.E.,Morrison,J.C., Loucks, C. J., Allnutt, T. F., Ricketts, T. H., Kura, Y., Lamoreux,J.F.,Wettengel,W.W.,Hedao,P.&Kassem, K. R. (2001). Terrestrial ecoregions ofthe world: a new map of life on Earth. BioScience 51: 933 - 938.
  • Pinto, R. B., Mansano, V. F. & Tozzi, A. M. G. A. (2015). Reestablishment of Hymenaea travassii (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae), a species endem­ic to the Bolivian Chaco. Phytotaxa 219(1): 96 - 100.
  • Polhill, R. M. (1994). Classification of the Leguminosae & complete synopsis oflegume genera. In: F. A. Bisby, Buckingham & J. B. Harborne (eds), Phytochemical dictionary of the Leguminosae. Vol. 1. Plants and their constituents ,pp.35- 57. Chapman & Hall, London.
  • Queiroz, L. P. (2009). Leguminosas da caatinga. Associayao Plantas do Nordeste, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
  • Raposo,M.A.(1997).Anewspeciesof Arremon (Passeriformes: Emberizidae) from Brazil. Ararajuba 5(1): 3-9.
  • Ribeiro, R. D., Cardoso, D. B. O. S. & Lima, H. C. (2015). A new species of Hymenaea (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae) with a revised identification key to the genus in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Syst. Bot. 40(1): 151 - 156.
  • Souza, I. M., Funch, L. S. & Queiroz, L. P. (2014). Morphological analyses suggest a new taxonomic circumscription for Hymenaea courbaril L. (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae). PhytoKeys 38: 101 - 118.
  • Taddei, V. A. & Lim, B. K. (2010). A new species of Chiroderma (Chiroptera, Phyllostomidae) from Northeastern Brazil. Brazil. J. Biol. 70(2): 381 - 386.
  • Vivallo, F. & Melo, G. A. R. (2009). Taxonomy and geographic distribution of the species of Centris of the hyptidis group (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Centridini), with description of a new species from central Brazil. Zootaxa 2075: 33 - 44.

  • Kew Backbone Distributions

    The International Plant Names Index and World Checklist of Selected Plant Families 2022. Published on the Internet at and
    © Copyright 2017 World Checklist of Selected Plant Families.

  • Kew Bulletin

    Kew Bulletin

  • Kew Names and Taxonomic Backbone

    The International Plant Names Index and World Checklist of Selected Plant Families 2022. Published on the Internet at and
    © Copyright 2017 International Plant Names Index and World Checklist of Selected Plant Families.