Sorbus erzincanica Dönmez

Native to:

Türkiye

KewBulletinVol77

• Aldasoro, J. J., Aedo, C., Navarro, C. & Garmendia, F. M. (1998). The genus Sorbus (Maloideae, Rosaceae) in Europe and in North Africa: morphological analysis and systematics. Syst. Bot. 23: 189 – 212.
• Boissier, E. (1872). Sorbus L. In: Flora Orientalis 2: 657 – 659. H. Georg, Genevae Et Basileae.
• Campbell, C. S., Evans, R. C., Morgan, D. R., Dickinson, T. A. & Arsenault, M. P. (2007). Phylogeny of subtribe Pyrinae (formerly the Maloideae, Rosaceae): Limited resolution of a complex evolutionary history. Pl. Syst. Evol. 266: 119 – 145.
• Davis, P. H. (1971). Distribution patterns in Anatolia with particular reference to endemism. In: P. H. Davis, P. C. Harper & I. C. Hedge (eds), Plant life of south–west Asia, pp. 15 – 27. Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh.
• Dönmez, A. A. & Özderin, S. (2019). Additional contributions to taxonomy, nomenclature and biogeography of the Turkish Crataegus (Rosaceae) taxa. PhytoKeys 122: 1 – 13.
• Gabrieljan, E. (1978). Rjabiny (Sorbus L.) ZapadnojAziiiGimalaev. Yerevan.
• Grant, V. (1981). Plant Speciation, 2nd edn. Columbia University Press, New York.
• Hajrudinovic´, A., Siljak-Yakovlev, S., Brown, S. C., Pustahija, F., Bourge, M., Ballian, D. & Bogunic F. (2015). When sexual meets apomict — genome size, ploidy level and reproduction mode variation of Sorbus aria s.l. and S. austriaca (Rosaceae) in Bosn
• Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T. & Ryan, P. D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 4 – 9.
• Hedlund, T. (1901). Monographie der Gattung Sorbus. Kongl. Svenska Vetensk. Akad. Handl. n.s. 35: 1 – 147.
• Hörandl, E. (2006). The complex causality of geographical parthenogenesis. New Phytol. 171: 525 – 538.
• IUCN (2016). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016–3. . [Accessed 20 Nov. 2019].
• Jankun, A. (1993). Evolutionary significance of apomixis in the genus Sorbus (Rosaceae). Fragm Florist. Geobot. Polon. 38: 627 – 686.
• Krivoruchko,, O. V. & Gamulya, O. V. (2013). The anatomical study of Sorbus Aucuparia and Sorbus Domestica Leaves. News of Pharmacy 4 (76): 33 – 36.
• Leitch, I. J., Johnston, E., Pellicer, J., Hidalgo, O. & Bennett, M. D. (2019). Plant DNA C-values Database (Release 7.1) https://cvalues.science.kew.org/
• Li, M., Tetsuo, O.-T., Gao, Y. D., Xu, B., Zhu, Z. M., Ju, W.-B. & Gao, X.-F. (2017). Molecular phylogenetics and historical biogeography of Sorbus sensustricto (Rosaceae). Molec. Phylogenet. Evol. 111: 76 – 86.
• Lo, E. Y. Y. & Donoghue, M. J. (2012). Expanded phylogenetic and dating analyses of the apples and their relatives (Pyreae, Rosaceae). Molec. Phylogenet. Evol. 63: 230 – 243.
• Mabberley, D. J. (2008). Mabberley's Plant-Book: A portable dictionary of plants, their classification and uses, Third edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Maciejewska-Rutkowska, I. & Bednorz, L. (2004). SEM and Stereoscope Microscope observations on the seeds of the Polish Species of the Genus Sorbus L. (Rosaceae). Acta Soc. Bot. Poloniae 73: 293 – 300.
• McAllister, H. (2005). The Genus Sorbus, Mountain Ash and Other Rowans. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
• Medail, F. & Diadema, K. (2009). Glacial refugia influence plant diversity patterns in the Mediterranean Basin. Biogeogr. 36: 1333 – 1345.
• Mittermeier, R. A., Robles Gil, P., Hoffman, M., Pilgrim, J., Brooks, T., Mittermeier, C. G., Lamoreux, J. & da Fonseca, G. A. B. (2005). Hotspots Revisited: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions. Conservation Internation
• Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853 – 858.
• Noroozi, J., Naqinezhad, A., Talebi, A., Doostmohammadi, M., Plutzar, C., Rumpf, S. B., Asgarpour, Z. & Schneeweiss G. M. (2019). Hotspots of vascular plant endemism in a global biodiversity hotspot in Southwest Asia suffer from significant conservation g
• Pellicer, J., Clermont, S., Houston, L., Rich, T. C. G. & Fay M. F. (2012). Cytotype diversity in the Sorbus complex (Rosaceae) in Britain: sorting out the puzzle. Ann. Bot. 110: 1185 – 1193.
• Rehder, A. (1949). Bibliography of cultivated trees and shrubs. Arnold Arboretum, Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts.
• Robertson, A., Newton, A. C. & Ennos, R. A. (2004a). Multiple hybrid origins, genetic diversity and population genetic structure of two endemic Sorbus taxa on the Isle of Arran, Scotland. Molec. Ecol. 13: 123 – 143
• Robertson, K. R., Phipps, J. B., Rohrer, J. R. & Smith, P. G. A. (1991). Synopsis of Genera in Maloideae (Rosaceae). Syst. Bot. 16: 376 – 394.
• Savaş Tuna, G., Yücel, G., Ascıogul, T. K., Ates, D., Esiyok, D., Tanyolac, M. B. & Tuna, M. (2020). Molecular Cytogenetic Characterization of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Accessions. Turk. J. Agric. Forest. 44: 612 – 630.
• Sennikov, A. N. & Kurtto, A. (2017). A phylogenetic checklist of Sorbus s.l. (Rosaceae) in Europe. Memoranda Soc. Fauna Fl. Fenn. 93.
• Siljak-Yakovlev, S., Lamy, F., Takvorian, N., Valentin, N., Gouesbet, V., Hennion, F. & Robert, T. (2020). Genome size and chromosome number of ten plant species from Kerguelen Islands. Polar Biology 43: 1985 – 1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-020-027
• Soltis, P. S. & Soltis, D. E. (2009). The role of hybridization in plant speciation. Annual Rev. Pl. Biol. 60: 561 – 588.
• Talent, N. & Dickinson, T. A. (2005). Polyploidy in Crataegus and Mespilus (Rosaceae, Maloideae): evolutionary inferences from flow cytometry of nuclear DNA amounts. Canad. J. Bot. 83: 1268 – 1304.
• UğurluAydın, Z. & Dönmez, A. A. (2015). Taxonomic and nomenclatural contributions to Pyrus L. (Rosaceae) from Turkey. Turk. J. Bot. 39: 841 – 849.
• Wenzig, T. (1883). Die PomaceenCharaktere der Gattungen und Arten. Jahrb. Königl. Bot. Gart. Berlin 2: 287 – 307.
• Yandovka, L. F., Dvoretskaya, T. S. & Firsov, G. A. (2019). Anatomic and morphological peculiarities of fruits and seeds of Sorbus L. (Rosaceae) Genus under Conditions of Introduction. KnE Life Sciences 4 (14): 1165 – 1177. https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v4
• Zaikonnikova, T. I. & Kipiani, V. V. (1980). Chromosome counts in some species of Sorbus (Rosaceae) in the flora of the USSR. Bot. Žurn. 65: 1326 – 1330.
• Zhang, S. D., Jin, J. J., Chen, S. Y., Chase, M. W., Soltis, D. E., Li, H. T., Yang, J. B., Li, D. Z. & Yi, T. S. (2017). Diversification of Rosaceae since the Late Cretaceous based on plastid phylogenomics. New Phytol. 214: 1355 – 1367.
• Zhukovsky, P. M. (1951). Agricultural structure of Turkey. [In Turkish: Türkiye’ninZiraiBünyesi (Anadolu)], Translated by: C. Kıpçak, H. Nouruzhan & S. Türkistanlı]. Türkiye ŞekerFabrikalarıNeşriyatı No: 20, Ankara.
• Zohary, D. & Hopf, M. (2000). Domestication of plants in the Old World. 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York.
• ____ & Sydes, C. (2006). Sorbus pseudomeinichii, a new endemic Sorbus (Rosaceae) microspecies from Arran, Scotland. Watsonia 26: 9 – 14.
• ____ & UğurluAydın, Z. (2017). Biogeographic and taxonomic contributions to the Genus Sorbus L. (Rosaceae) in Turkey: Sorbus buschiana and Sorbus luristanica. Hacettepe J. Biol. Chem. 45: 337 – 341.
• ____ & Yerli, S. V. (2018). Biodiversity in Turkey. In: T. Pullaiah (ed.), Global Biodiversity Vol. 2. Selected Countries in Europe, Chapter 11, p. 46. Apple Academic Press, Palm Bay, Florida.
• ____, Rich, T. C. G., Allen, A. M., Houston, L., Roberts, C., Bridle, J. R., Harris, S. A. & Hiscock S. J. (2010). Hybridization and polyploidy as drivers of continuing evolution and speciation in Sorbus. Molec. Ecol. 19: 1675 – 1690.
• ____, ____ & ____(2004b). Breeding systems and continuing evolution in the endemic Sorbus taxa on Arran. Heredity 93: 487 – 495.